Neutral Workplace Harassment Investigation for Tennessee Employers
When a harassment complaint names a manager, a long-time employee or someone close to leadership, an internal review can look compromised no matter how carefully it is done. Birds Eye provides outside PIs who interview, document and report findings of fact without a stake in the outcome.
- Outside PIs with no reporting line to management
- Structured interviews with written summaries
- Findings of fact, not legal conclusions
What prompted the review?
Pick the closest match and we will point you to the right next step.
Why use an outside workplace harassment investigation?
An outside workplace harassment investigation uses PIs who have no reporting relationship with the people involved. They interview the complainant, the accused and witnesses, collect documents and messages, and write findings of fact. The employer, usually with counsel, then decides on any action, which helps the process look and be fair.
When an Internal Review Is Not Enough
Many harassment complaints are handled well by a capable HR team. Some are harder. The accused may be a senior leader, the HR manager may be a witness, the complaint may involve several departments, or earlier complaints may have gone nowhere. In those situations employees on both sides may doubt any conclusion reached by people who report to the same leadership.
An outside PI agency gives the employer a process that is visibly separate. Our PIs have no promotion, friendship or history inside the organization. That independence cannot promise everyone will accept the result, but it removes a common reason to challenge it and gives leadership a clearer basis for its decision. It also lets HR staff remain in their usual roles instead of judging colleagues.
Defining Scope Before the First Interview
A clean investigation starts with a written scope: the specific allegations to examine, the time period, the people to interview first and the documents the employer will provide. We agree who at the organization is our contact, usually HR leadership or employer counsel, and who must be kept out of the loop because of their connection to the complaint. Scope is reviewed with counsel.
If new allegations surface during interviews, we do not simply widen the investigation on our own. We report them to the contact, and the employer decides whether to add them to scope. That keeps the record clear about what was examined and why. It also protects the complainant and respondent from an investigation that drifts into unrelated matters without their knowledge or any clear reason.
How Our PIs Conduct Interviews
Interviews usually begin with the complainant, then the accused, then witnesses, with follow-up rounds as needed. Our PIs explain their role, that the employer prohibits retaliation, and how information will be handled. Questions are open, not leading, and the same key questions are asked of each witness so accounts can be compared fairly. Interviews are scheduled privately, away from coworkers where possible.
Each interview produces a written summary. Where the employer and counsel approve, witnesses may review their summary for accuracy. Our PIs note demeanor only in factual terms and avoid characterizing anyone. If a witness is represented by a lawyer regarding the matter, contact goes through that lawyer. The respondent always receives a full opportunity to answer each allegation. Nobody is rushed.
- Complainant interview and document collection
- Respondent interview with full opportunity to answer
- Witness interviews using consistent core questions
- Follow-up interviews on conflicting accounts
- Written summary for every interview
Talk it through with a licensed PI
Tell us what is happening. We will explain what the work involves and put scope, timeline and cost in writing before anything starts.
Documents, Messages and Physical Context
Harassment cases often turn on texts, chat messages, emails and calendar entries. Our PIs collect what the employer controls and what participants voluntarily provide, and log where each item came from. We do not access personal devices or accounts without the owner's consent, and we do not use pretexting or deception to obtain messages. Items are preserved in their original form where possible.
Physical context can matter too. Office layout, who could see or hear whom, badge or schedule records and shift rosters can confirm or undercut an account. We photograph relevant spaces and match records to the dates at issue, then fold everything into a single chronology. Where records and testimony disagree, the chronology shows both. Gaps in the record are noted rather than filled with assumption.
A Findings-of-Fact Report, Not a Verdict
The final report describes the allegations, the steps taken, the evidence reviewed and the findings on each allegation, typically stated as whether the evidence supports that the conduct occurred. It explains the reasoning, including how conflicting accounts were weighed, so a reader can follow it without having been in the room. Supporting summaries and the evidence log are attached as exhibits.
The report does not decide whether conduct was illegal or what discipline should follow. Legal conclusions belong to counsel, and employment decisions belong to the employer. Birds Eye can prepare the report in a format counsel requests when privilege considerations are in play. Leadership then acts on facts rather than on competing stories. The reasoning is laid out for any later reviewer.
Retaliation, Confidentiality and Safety
Participants worry about what happens after they talk. We remind every witness of the employer's anti-retaliation policy and tell the employer promptly if anyone reports pressure, exclusion or threats connected to the investigation. We share information only on a need-to-know basis within the scope agreed with the employer. Participants are told plainly how their information will be used. Nothing is shared casually.
If anyone describes a threat of violence or immediate danger, the priority is safety. If someone is in immediate danger, they should call 911 right away. We notify the employer contact right away so interim protective steps can be considered, and our threat assessment work is available when concerning behavior needs a structured review. Safety concerns are never held back until the final report. We act on them immediately.
What a Harassment Review Includes
Written scope
Allegations, time period, contacts and document list agreed at the outset.
Structured interviews
Complainant, respondent and witness interviews with consistent core questions.
Interview summaries
A written summary of each interview, kept in a consistent format.
Evidence log
Every document, message and photo logged with source and date received.
Unified chronology
Testimony and records combined into one dated timeline.
Findings report
Findings of fact on each allegation with the reasoning explained.
Review Stages
Intake and scope
We meet with HR or employer counsel to define allegations, contacts and documents.
Evidence gathering
Employer-controlled records and voluntarily provided materials are collected and logged.
Interview rounds
Our PIs interview in an agreed order and follow up where accounts conflict.
Report delivery
The findings report goes to the designated contact, followed by a debrief if requested.
Choosing who investigates a harassment complaint
| Approach | Strengths | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Internal HR review | Knows policies and people; fast to start | Perceived bias if leadership or HR is involved |
| Outside PI agency | Independent, experienced interviewers, documented method | Needs clear scope and a single employer contact |
| Employer counsel investigates | Legal perspective and possible privilege | Counsel may become a witness about the investigation |
| PI agency directed by counsel | Independence plus counsel oversight of scope | Coordinate format early if privilege matters |
Before You Call Birds Eye
Gathering these items helps the review start quickly and cleanly.
Statewide coverage from Nashville
Birds Eye conducts workplace harassment reviews for employers across Tennessee, from offices and plants in Nashville, Franklin and Clarksville to facilities in Knoxville, Chattanooga and Kingsport and operations in Memphis and Jackson. Our PIs can interview on site, at a neutral location or by video, and multi-location employers can have witnesses interviewed across regions using the same questions and format.
All service areasNashvilleMemphisKnoxvilleChattanoogaProcess serving
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a private investigator investigate harassment at work?
Yes. Employers and their counsel can engage a licensed Tennessee PI agency to conduct a neutral fact-finding review. The agency interviews, gathers evidence and reports findings of fact. The employer decides on any action, with legal advice from counsel. The review is most credible when the agency has no prior relationship with the people involved and uses a written scope.
Can an employee hire Birds Eye to investigate their employer?
An employee with a harassment concern should use internal reporting channels and speak with an employment attorney. If there is a legal claim, the attorney can engage a PI agency for fact-gathering. Our wrongful termination page covers that side of employment disputes. Employees who fear retaliation should also document dates, witnesses and messages.
Do participants have to talk to you?
Employees may be expected by their employer to cooperate with workplace investigations, but that is an employer policy question. Our PIs never threaten or pressure anyone, and we note refusals factually. Refusals are recorded without comment, and the report explains how missing accounts affected the findings on each allegation.
Will the accused person see the report?
Report distribution is the employer's decision, usually with advice from counsel. We deliver the report to the designated contact and do not share it with participants ourselves. Many employers share a summary of the outcome with the complainant and respondent rather than the full report, but that choice belongs to the employer and its counsel.
How long does a harassment review take?
It depends on the number of allegations, witnesses and locations, and on witness availability. We put scope, timeline and cost in writing before starting and update the contact if the timeline changes. Reviews involving one allegation and a handful of witnesses are typically shorter than multi-site matters, and interim updates keep the contact informed.
Do you recommend discipline?
No. We report findings of fact. Decisions about discipline, training or other remedies belong to the employer and its counsel. Keeping findings separate from decisions protects the neutrality of the review. If the employer later asks about options, counsel is the right source of advice on discipline and remedies.
Related pages
Start a Review People Can Trust
HR leaders and employer counsel can call or text (629) 310-8667 or email contact@delatorgroup.com. Scope, timeline and cost are agreed in writing first.
Photography: Mateusz Zatorski (Unsplash License). Last reviewed . General information, not legal advice.
